WUNRN

http://www.wunrn.com

WIDE is a European feminist network of women´s organisations, development NGOs, gender specialists and women´s rights activists. WIDE monitors and influences international economic and development policy and practice from a feminist perspective. http://www.wide-network.org/index.jsp?id=11

Website Link to WIDE News - March 2008:

http://62.149.193.10/wide/download/2008_News_3.pdf?id=592

 

Sample excerpts from WIDE Network Newsletter:

 

*The CSW - UN Commission on the Status of Women 2008 proved an important forum for networking, strengthening ties among the feminist movement, exchanging views and building collective thinking and engaging in a dialogue with government delegations. However, civil society organisations were not as successful in influencing the main negotiations taking place. It was a difficult process to influence, due to the limitations in access to the negotiations, especially given that in the second and final week of the CSW the negotiations took place behind close doors where the countries from all over the world negotiated together with some grouping together as nations and negotiating from one common position.

 

*(With the CSW Agreed Conclusions), one of the main disappointments is the vague and weak language used, “recommending and encouraging” the governments instead of strong commitment towards financing for gender equality. Moreover, one of the major concerns at the 52nd session of the CSW was the need to ensure that the most conservative governments did not put in danger the already achieved previous commitments, a worry that has been commonly shared in the last years in the context of different processes within the UN.

 

*One of the main challenges we have as a network is to improve our efforts to influence negotiations and outcomes by investing more in the coordination of and preparation for such events at a national, European and international level.

 

WIDE Newsletter, Number 3, 2008
News from March       


 

1. WIDE at the 52nd Session of the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW): Introduction

2. WIDE and the CSW 1: Adequate aid through increasing aid: a condition to achieve gender equality

3. WIDE and the CSW 2: The CSW as a tool to influence governments

4. WIDE and the CSW 3: Watered-down agreed conclusions

 5. GEAR Campaign update: Women unite to push for a UN that really works for all women

6. WIDE regional platform KARAT: “Fair Play – always in fashion”

7. Aid effectiveness, further updates in the run up to Accra

8. Update: Financing for Development 

Globalising
gender equality
and
social justice

 

 

 


 

 

 

WIDE at the 52nd Session of the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW): Introduction

 

WIDE participated with a large delegation of its members in the 52nd Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) on “Financing for gender equality and the empowerment of women” that was held 25 February – 7 March at the UN in New York. WIDE tried to influence governments’ positions and the outcomes of negotiations around the agreed conclusions and proposed resolutions. WIDE also exchanged thoughts and experiences with many other NGOs among them WIDE’s international partners, participating in and co-leading a number of the parallel events and NGOs caucuses. This WIDE newsletter contains three reports by WIDE member delegates, along with a report on the GEAR Campaign, which also played a role at the CSW.

 

Further information

 

First draft of the agreed conclusions, a draft by the CSW Bureau as a starting point for the negotiations: http://62.149.193.10/wide/download/preliminaryconclusions.pdf?id=591

 

Final draft of the agreed conclusions: http://www.un.org/womenwatch/daw/csw/csw52/AC_resolutions/L.8_Advance%20unedited_as%20corrected.pdf

 

Additional statement made by the EU delegation on the agreed conclusions: http://62.149.193.10/wide/download/EU%20Statement%20on%20the%20AGREED%20CONCLUSIONS.pdf?id=589

 

WIDE CSW position paper: http://62.149.193.10/wide/download/CSW%202008_WIDE%20Position%20Paper.pdf?id=579

 

 

WIDE and the CSW 1: Adequate aid through increasing aid: a condition to achieve gender equality

By Ana Lydia Fernández-Layos

 

If one looks at the number of participants that attended the latest CSW, it seems a big success. According to unofficial data it seems that 1600 representatives of civil society organisations were present at the 52nd session of the CSW, 400 more than in 2005 at the Beijing +10 review, making this one of the highest-attended CSWs ever.

 

The CSW proved an important forum for networking, strengthening ties among the feminist movement, exchanging views and building collective thinking and engaging in a dialogue with government delegations. However, civil society organisations were not as successful in influencing the main negotiations taking place. It was a difficult process to influence, due to the limitations in access to the negotiations, especially given that in the second and final week of the CSW the negotiations took place behind close doors where the countries from all over the world negotiated together with some grouping together as nations and negotiating from one common position. Also it was difficult to get the latest relevant updated information on time to be able to give feedback on the process, although it helped a great deal WIDE representatives were part of some of the EU member state delegations and that other representatives of the network had frequent contact with the Spanish government. Moreover, it turned out the possibility to influence EU member states was limited because they had come up with a common position in the first days of the CSW, based on negotiations that had already commenced before the CSW. All these aspects, together with the general lack of political will from the governments to make concrete commitments, resulted in somehow sweet and sour agreed conclusions.

 

The main demands of the international feminist movement were focused on:

 

-          Achieving concrete governmental commitment to ensure adequate and sufficient resources for gender equality and the empowerment of women, with special emphasis on direct financing for organisations working to promote gender equality;

-          The urgent need to guarantee civil society organisation participation in all national and international processes promoting gender equality;

-          Achieving strong commitment to policy coherence based on sustainable development that will ensure gender equality in all contexts;

-          Achieving more on the mutual accountability of all governments, donors and recipients and citizens;

-          Making progress with gender responsive budgeting (mainstreaming gender in all resource allocations), sex disaggregated data and the development and use of gender indicators in all planning, monitoring and evaluation processes;

-          And the establishment of a strengthened gender entity within the UN with more political power and resources to ensure the achievement of gender equality and policy coherence at the international level.

 

CSW outcomes

 

Some of the positive results of the 52nd session of the CSW, as the agreed conclusions reflect, are:

 

However, one of the main disappointments is the vague and weak language used, “recommending and encouraging” the governments instead of strong commitment towards financing for gender equality. Moreover, one of the main concerns at the 52nd session of the CSW was the need to ensure that the most conservative governments did not put in danger the already achieved previous commitments, a worry that has been commonly shared in the last years in the context of different processes within the UN. For instance, some of the governments who have not ratified the CEDAW (mainly Iran and the US) were against the inclusion of reference to the CEDAW in the final text and when it was agreed that it would be included they reaffirmed that they “will dissociate themselves from those sections of the text that referenced that instrument and its monitoring body”.

 

Other very controversial issues in the negotiations were:

 

 

 

Additional EU statement

 

The EU delegation did not completely agree with the agreed conclusions and presented an additional statement remarking that the contributions of civil society and women’s organisations around the world to gender equality “have not been rightly recognized and that adequate supporting of their future work toward gender equality and the empowerment of women has not been appropriately addressed”. Moreover, they expressed the concern that linking the commitments made in the agreed conclusions (paragraph 21) to “national priorities” weakens the agreed conclusions and leaves the door open to governments to decide upon their own criteria on whether it is necessary or sufficient to achieve the commitments made.

 

Our challenges ahead

 

One of the main challenges we have as a network is to improve our efforts to influence negotiations and outcomes by investing more in the coordination of and preparation for such events at a national, European and international level. For instance, even though we were able to strengthen dialogue and exchange information with the Spanish delegation, our capacity to influence their position at the CSW was limited. It is important with future processes in mind for women’s organisations to have a series of preparatory meetings[1][1]  in advance, and establish a fluent dialogue with governments at a national level, based on our developed positions, before the negotiations at the official event start. In order to achieve this, it is crucial for the feminist movement to count on enough human and financial resources to develop advocacy and lobby programmes, and to improve our capacity to be able to participate in all the stages of these processes that can make such a difference to gender equality and women´s lives. Hence, it is necessary to get adequate and sufficient funding to fulfil our mission to make a difference in the advancement of women´s rights.

 

Ana Lydia Fernández-Layos is a member of the WIDE Spanish platform.

 


 

 

WIDE and the CSW 2: The CSW as a tool to influence governments

By Plamenka Markova

 

For the WIDE Bulgarian platform the CSW provided a lot of useful knowledge, for instance on emerging issues such as “gender perspective and climate change” or around gender budgeting which is still unknown in Bulgaria, and participation in some of the side events presented useful information on setbacks and good practices from different parts of the world. The CSW also enabled the Bulgarian platform to connect with other NGOs to share ideas and was a learning opportunity on the CSW and how its outcomes and documents can be used to lobby our own government.

 

Bulgaria is not a member of the Commission on the Status of Women at present and there was no government delegation at the session. This placed a restriction on us lobbying our government and will make it a challenge also in the coming years to raise the government’s awareness, encourage them to participate and do more for gender equality and women’s empowerment. Tools I think we can use in this context are some of the reports of the Secretary-General on the theme for this CSW. His first report (document E/CN.6/2008/2) provides a useful overview of gender perspectives on the six core areas of action of the UN Monterrey Consensus on Financing for Development. The report concludes that the failure to secure adequate resources to fully implement the Beijing Platform for Action constrains the achievement of gender equality and the empowerment of women and it proposes recommendations for further action. This conclusion should be underlined in our dialogue with the Bulgarian government. Another useful report of the Secretary-General (document E/CN.6/2008/5) assesses the extent to which financing for gender equality and the empowerment of women is mainstreamed in policies and programmes at the national level.

 

The wide-ranging agreed conclusions on "financing for gender equality and women's empowerment" can be another tool. The agreed conclusions highlighted the role of national machineries in the advancement of women and of relevant governmental entities in financing gender equality. Among others, actions were put forward for strengthening institutional frameworks, accountability mechanisms, and capacity building in order to systematically incorporate gender perspectives into budgetary policies and processes at all levels. The conclusions can serve as the basis for urging governments to integrate a gender perspective – and increase women's participation – in the design, implementation and monitoring of economic plans and strategies in a coordinated manner and across all policy areas, including in national development, social protection and poverty reduction.

 

Finally, I was not surprised by the difficulties met by NGO representatives at the CSW. The UN obviously is not well adapted at the moment to work with NGOs, to listen to civil society, and it will take time to change this mentality. Anyway, dialogue with them might in the end be successful.

 

Plamenka Markova is the WIDE Steering Group representative of WIDE’s Bulgarian platform.

 

WIDE and the CSW 3: Watered-down agreed conclusions

By Kinga Lohmann


This year’s session of the CSW was clearly placed in the context of development and financing for development. A paradox of the 52nd CSW session, however, was the fact that the governmental debates did not really focus on the main topic, i.e. the allocation of financial resources to achieve the goals of gender equality. The draft of the agreed conclusions that was presented by the Bureau of the CSW contained just four pages including 13 paragraphs of recommendations. This was a starting point for the governments' amendment proposals and negotiations during this two-week session with the aim to come to a final set of conclusions.
  

The content of the draft largely recalls and/or reaffirms the commitments to achieve gender equality and women's empowerment included in the main UN documents such as the Beijing Platform for Action, CEDAW, Monterrey Consensus, 2005 World Summit and others (articles 1-8). It presents the main areas of concern (articles 9-10) and lists the recommendations (articles 11-13) based on the above mentioned documents. The draft clearly noted that these global commitments have not yet been implemented, and invites different stakeholders to take specific actions focusing on financing for gender equality and women's empowerment.

Financing for gender equality, especially financing for the main actors women's NGOs who contribute the most to ensure gender equality in Eastern Europe, is a crucial issue for many women’s human rights organisations. This is particularly true for small NGOs, which were severely affected by the lack of available funds for their activities and advocacy during the last few years in this part of Europe. Thus, the key recommendation of the draft was for them article 11 u: “Ensure that direct funding goes to women's organizations to advance their autonomy and sustainability, and increase support for women's funds which provide small grants to women initiatives”. The European Women's Caucus’ amendments to the draft agreed conclusions made this article more specific and adequate by adding: “sustainable core funding” and “including small NGOs and those at the grass root level” who should be considered as those who were affected the most by the current trend to provide big grants which practically exclude small NGOs.

Unfortunately, government representatives, particularly those of the EU member states present at the 52nd CSW session were not open to the NGOs’ lobbying and did not have the will to propose more concrete targets and mechanisms. So, the recommendation on financing for NGOs and networks was totally watered-down, considerably weakened and will not contribute to the sustainability of women's NGOs. From the final draft of the adopted agreed conclusions, article 21 ll: “Create and enhance a supportive environment for the mobilization of resources by non-governmental organizations, particularly women's organizations and networks, to enable them to increase their effectiveness and to contribute to gender equality and the empowerment of women, including through assisting in the implementation of the Platform for Action and participating in policy processes and programme delivery”. 
  

While the governmental negotiations and outcome document were quite disappointing, at the same the session was a great opportunity for meeting and strategising with other women. An important meeting was initiated by IWRAW (International Women's Rights Action Watch) Asia Pacific to discuss with regional women’s networks building an alliance for exploring ways to develop and strengthen cross-regional advocacy for women's rights within the framework of the UN CEDAW. This was meant to be the first step towards building a global partnership in executing women's rights worldwide through the UN Human Rights system.


Kinga Lohmann is WIDE’s steering group representative of the Karat Coalition – WIDE’s regional platform.

 

GEAR Campaign update: Women unite to push for a UN that really works for all women

By Gea Meijers

 

During the 52nd session of the Commission on the Status of Women (CSW) women’s organisations, networks and other civil society groups came together to lobby on the Gender Equality Architecture Reform (GEAR) recommendations that demand that the United Nations (UN) machinery is strengthened so that it can deliver much better with member states on commitments made on women’s rights. Organisations and networks also strategised on what we can do in our regions and globally in the coming months to keep lobbying our governments.

 

Public launch of the GEAR campaign

 

In the first week of the CSW the civil society GEAR campaign was publicly launched and organisations that took part in one of the most-attended CSWs ever were informed about the campaign and its recommendations. This resulted in a very strong push by women’s organisations from Europe, Africa, Asia and Latin America towards their governments to include the recommendations in the agreed conclusions. WIDE was part of these events as regional focal point of the European Working Group coordinating the GEAR efforts in Europe.

 

The agreed conclusions of the CSW, which were finalised in the early morning hours of Saturday 8 March, incorporated several of the key demands of the GEAR Campaign, though they were not fully incorporated. And the overall commitments were weak with regard to financing for gender equality, with no concrete targets or timetables and no strong mechanisms for effective tracking or monitoring of financial resources spent on gender equality. The conclusions noted “under-resourcing in the area of gender equality in the UN system” and stressed “the need for more effective tracking of resources… spent on enhancing gender equality…” (paragraph 19). In addition, the agreed conclusions called for the strengthening of the UN system both through more effective gender mainstreaming and in terms of “enhancing its capacity to effectively assist States upon request…on gender equality and women’s empowerment…and to make adequate and reliable human and financial resources available” (paragraph 21 kk).

 

In the national statements that countries delivered during the CSW, over 40 countries spoke of the need to strengthen the UN’s institutional mechanisms on gender equality and called for a consolidated women’s entity led by an Under Secretary General and with an extensive country presence. The GEAR Campaign statement has already been undersigned by more than 260 organisations and the statement is available for more organisations to sign.

 

Strategising GEAR

The global GEAR strategy meeting held just before the CSW, organised by Women’s Environment and Development Organization (WEDO) and Center for Women’s Global Leadership (CWGL), provided a good space to share information about discussions within UN member states around the “one” UN reform process. Thoughts were also exchanged on ongoing strategising in the context of the GEAR Campaign. Regional focal points were formally established. In addition an initial research paper prepared by Aruna Rao, director of Gender at Work, was discussed. The discussion showed the richness of thought among organisations and networks working on gender equality regarding the weaknesses of the current UN machinery for women’s rights, and what actions are needed to improve the situation. The paper expressed a common understanding among organisations of problems, needs and solutions. In the discussion following the presentation of the paper many good points were raised. It was suggested for example that we should not go to deep into the technical details of what we want. The UN has specific regulations and structural rules for entities, departments, etc. and thus the UN should take a lead in translating our demands in the proper technical language.

 

GEAR European Working Group
 

The European Working Group for the GEAR campaign has continued since its launch in the spring 2007 to lobby European governments and coordinate actions in Europe. WIDE together with other networks and organisations in Europe has asked the EU to keep politically supporting the GEAR recommendations and to increase financial resources for entities in the UN and for civil society organisations that are specifically devoted to women’s empowerment and gender equality. In the beginning of April members of the European Working Group will meet to discuss our strategies for the coming period. Organisations and networks that want to take part actively in the collaborative work in Europe are invited to join our efforts.

 

Further information

 

European Working Group

For further information and stating interest to be involved, please contact Gea Meijers, gea[at]wide-network.org


Current member organisations are: ACTSA, BGRF/WIDE Bulgarian platform, IGPN, European Women’s Lobby, OXFAM/novib, WIDE, WOMANKIND and GADnetwork UK

 

Global Gear Statement

To read the GEAR statement, go to: http://www.wedo.org/library.aspx?ResourceID=244

And to undersign the statement, write to: gearcampaign[at]gmail.com

 

WIDE regional platform KARAT: “Fair Play – always in fashion”

By Joanna Szabunko

 

KARAT, WIDE’s regional platform in Central and Eastern Europe and the Commonwealth of Independent States, has published a new report ‘”Fair Play – always in fashion. Consumers’ awareness and working conditions of women in sportswear industry”. The report is part of the project “Fair Play in sporting goods production”. In the past year KARAT has been implementing the project that is aimed at improving working conditions in factories manufacturing sporting goods.

 

The main project activities include monitoring working conditions with factories, advocacy and lobbying directed at sports companies and sports institutions (mainly the International Olympic Committee) and above all, awareness raising (education activities, press work and campaigns). This project is a continuation of KARAT’s cooperation with the Clean Clothes Campaign and it is implemented together with NGOs from Austria (Sudwind Agentur) and Germany (Inkota).

 

The year 2008 will be a culmination of  activities linked to major sport events: the European football championships (EURO 2008) taking place in Austria and Switzerland in June, and the Olympic Games held in Beijing in August. All project partners support in their activities the  PlayFair2008 Campaign that urges companies, sports institutions, fans and consumers to take inspiration from the spirit of the Olympics and act to eliminate the exploitation and abuse of workers in the global sporting goods industry and to ensure that the principle of fair play can be extended to the workplace.

 

Women and fair play

 

Women constitute the majority of garment industry workers worldwide (including sports wear) as well as the majority of garment industry consumers. The project contributes to improving of the workers’ situation by addressing and linking both of these groups: improving on the one hand poor working conditions of women workers in sportswear production, and on the other hand raising consumers’ awareness and increasing their commitment towards improving these conditions. This is a novel approach in Poland, in Central and Eastern Europe and for KARAT.

 

The working conditions of women in the garment industry are an important issue in Central and Eastern Europe where garment, including sportswear, production is still an important industry. For several years the KARAT Secretariat and KARAT’s member organisations in Romania, Bulgaria and Macedonia have been monitoring and campaigning for the improvement of working conditions of women in clothes factories. Currently, the situation is changing in some of the Central and Eastern European countries that have joined the EU. More and more foreign companies with whom garment factories have been mainly dealing with up until now are more and more moving their orders to countries where the labour costs are even cheaper and labour conditions worse, leaving garment factories in Central and Eastern Europe without orders. This trend has a significant impact on women employed in the industry. At the same time consumption in eastern EU member states is growing and the role of consumers is becoming more and more important. Involving consumers in campaigns towards the improvement of the workers’ situation has proved to be the best solution implemented by organisations in other countries (for example in the context of the Clean Clothes Campaign) and therefore it is now being introduced also with this project.

 

KARAT’s focus with the project is not only on the situation in Poland but on the broader context of globalisation, on development issues such as working conditions in developing countries, Corporate Social Responsibility and conscious consumption, and making more visible the complex interdependence in which we are all involved and on which we can have an impact and of which we should be conscious.

 

New report

 

The new publication “Fair Play – always in fashion. Consumers’ awareness and working conditions of women in sportswear industry” is a result of an analysis of available data and publications as well as interviews with producers, workers and consumers, unionists and sportswear market specialists. With the publication we are trying to show how the existence of Polish producers is contingent on the trends in the global clothing industry (transferring production to Asian countries), what is the situation of Polish seamstresses, how their situation depends on the working conditions and standards in Asian factories and, finally, how improving the workers’ situation depends on consumers in Poland and elsewhere making informed purchase decisions and demanding that clothes are produced with the noble sporting fair play principle to be observed also on the work floor with respect to workers employed in sportswear manufacturing. We have been particularly interested in the impact all these phenomena have on working conditions in sportswear manufacturing where mainly women are employed.